PREMIUM
News

Nothing ‘constructive’in report, says Brooks and others

‘‘There are no constructive recommendations, no changes and it will do nothing to bring water to our region at a time when we desperately need food productivity.’’That is Southern Riverina Irrigators chair Chris Brooks’ take on the Murray Darling Basin Plan report released by Mick Keelty last week.Mr Keelty was appointed Inspector-General of the inquiry into the management of Murray-Darling Basin Water Resources.Mr Brooks said he had high hopes this would be the report to highlight the issues around water sharing in particular, but said the report falls short.‘‘We went to Canberra (to rally) and we were disarmed by Keelty who said he would come and speak with us,’’ Mr Brooks said.‘‘He seemed to say all the right things, but this report is disappointing.‘‘We’re all shattered — after all the work we did with 24 people from northern Victoria, both sides of the Murray and even down to Sunraysia working on a committee to make a submission.‘‘It appears this report totally ignores submissions like ours.‘‘This is another one of 110 reviews that represents a further waste of $13 billion in taxpayers’ money.‘‘We feel we have been let down.’’ Recommendations put up in the report are as follows:●The MDBA should undertake further analysis of the causes of reduced inflows from the northern basin and the extent to which this is affecting state water shares.●To increase trust in and transparency about water-sharing, the MDBA should provide clear and easily accessible information about special accounting measures, including the circumstances under which they are applied and how they are used to determine state allocations.●The MDBA should clearly communicate the results of its examination of underuse of allocations and compare them with the submissions made to this inquiry so that accurate feedback can be provided to the community.●The Basin Officials Committee (BOC) should consider implementing a single authoritative platform that combines information currently available on the various Commonwealth and state websites, to provide higher levels of transparency and trust and to improve water literacy.●The BOC should consider ways through which States and agencies could work together across their respective jurisdictions to include water literacy in high school and higher education curriculums, including VET, in regional areas.

Hold tight - we’re checking permissions before loading more content